RNA Clean-Up and Concentration Kits
For rapid and efficient clean-up and concentration of total RNA, including microRNA, without phenol
For research use only and NOT intended for in vitro diagnostics.
Version Available Here.
RNA Clean-Up and Concentration Kits
For rapid and efficient clean-up and concentration of total RNA, including microRNA, without phenol
Register today to receive an exclusive 15% off* on your first order.
Features and Benefits
- Clean-up & concentrate total RNA (including miRNA) in minutes
- Clean-up & concentrate RNA from TRIzol®, TRI Reagent®, etc
- Clean-up RNA from contaminants including enzymes, primers, nucleotides
- Rapid spin-column protocol, elute in 20 µL
- 96-well format for high throughput processing & Micro-Elute spin column formats for 8 µL are available
- Purified RNA is suitable for a variety of downstream applications, including Small RNA Sequencing. Find out more information on Norgen's NGS services
- Purification is based on spin column chromatography that uses Norgen’s proprietary resin separation matrix
These kits are designed to clean-up and concentrate RNA (including miRNA) from TRIzol® and TRI Reagent®, enzymatic reactions, in vitro transcription, labelling reactions, etc. These are robust kits for all clean-up and concentration purposes for up to 35 µg of RNA in solution. The purified RNA is of the highest purity and integrity, and can be used in a number of downstream applications. These kits purify all sizes of RNA, from large mRNA and ribosomal RNA down to miRNA, siRNA and lncRNA.
RNA Clean-Up and Concentration Kit (Spin Column)
Norgen’s RNA Clean-Up and Concentration Kit provides a rapid method for the purification, cleanup and concentration of up to 35 μg of RNA isolated using different methods including phenol/guanidine-based protocols, and from various upstream enzymatic reactions such as DNase treatment and labeling. The kit elutes RNA in 20 µL. Complete 10 purifications in 20 minutes.
RNA Clean-Up and Concentration 96-Well Kit (High Throughput)
Norgen’s RNA Clean-Up and Concentration 96-Well Kit provides a rapid method for the purification, cleanup and concentration of up to 50 μg of RNA isolated using different methods including phenol/guanidine-based protocols, and from various upstream enzymatic reactions such as DNase treatment and labeling. The kit elutes RNA in 75 µL. Complete 10 purifications in 30 minutes.
RNA Clean-Up and Concentration Micro-Elute Kit (Micro-Elute)
Norgen’s RNA Clean-Up and Concentration Micro-Elution Kit provides a rapid method for the purification, cleanup and concentration of up to 10 μg of RNA isolated using different methods including phenol/guanidine-based protocols, and from various upstream enzymatic reactions such as DNase treatment, labeling and in vitro transcription. This kit is made for eluting RNA in smaller volumes of 8 µL for all types of downstream applications, for the highest concentration of RNA sample. Complete 10 purifications in 20 minutes.
Protocol
Details
Supporting Data
Kit Specifications (Spin Column)
|
|
Maximum Column Binding Capacity | 35 μg |
Size of RNA Purified | All sizes, including small RNA (<200 nt) |
Maximum Amount of Starting Material | 35 μg of RNA |
Minimum Elution Volume | 20 μL |
Time to Complete 10 Purifications | 20 minutes |
Average Recovery | ≥ 90% |
Storage Conditions and Product Stability
All solutions should be kept tightly sealed and stored at room temperature. This kit is stable for 2 years after the date of shipment.
Component | Cat. 23600 (50 preps) | Cat. 43200 (100 preps) | Cat. 25100 (192 preps) | Cat. 61000 (50 preps) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Buffer RL | 40 mL | 2 x 40 mL | 2 x 40 mL | 40 mL |
Wash Solution A | 38 mL | 2 x 38 mL | 2 x 38 mL | 38 mL |
Elution Solution A | 6 mL | 2 x 6 mL | 2 x 20 mL | 6 mL |
Column Activation Solution | - | - | - | 30 mL |
Micro Spin Columns | 50 | 100 | - | - |
Micro-Elute RNA Spin Columns | - | - | - | 50 |
96-Well Plate | - | - | 2 | - |
Adhesive Tape | - | - | 4 | - |
Collection Tubes | 50 | 100 | - | 50 |
96-Well Collection Plate | - | - | 2 | - |
Elution Tubes (1.7 mL) | 50 | 100 | - | 50 |
96-Well Elution Plate | - | - | 2 | - |
Product Insert | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Documentation
(43200) RNA Clean-Up and Concentration Kit (Spin Column)- Protocol (100 prep)
(25100) RNA Clean-Up and Concentration 96-Well Kit (High Throughput) - Protocol (96-well)
(61000) RNA Clean-Up and Concentration Micro-Elute Kit (Micro-Elute) - Protocol (50 prep)
FAQs
Spin Column, High Throughput, Micro-Elute
Poor DNA recovery could be due to one or a combination of the following factors:
- Column has become clogged.
Do not exceed the recommended amounts of starting materials. The amount of starting material may need to be decreased if the column shows clogging below the recommended levels. See FAQ related to “Clogged Columns/wells” below.
- An alternative elution solution was used.
It is recommended that the Elution Solution A supplied with this kit be used for maximum RNA recovery.
- Ethanol was not added to the lysate.
Ensure that the appropriate amount of ethanol is added to the lysate before binding to the column.
- Ethanol was not added to the Wash Solution A.
Ensure that 90 mL of 96 - 100% ethanol is added to the supplied Wash Solution A prior to use.
Column/well clogging can result from one or a combination of the following factors:
- High amounts of RNA as input.
Ensure that no more than 50 µg of RNA are used as input.
- High amounts of genomic DNA present in sample.
The lysate may be passed through a 25 gauge needle attached to a syringe 5-10 times in order to shear the genomic DNA prior to loading onto the column.
- Centrifuge temperature too low.
Ensure that the centrifuge remains at room temperature throughout the procedure. Temperatures below 15°C may cause precipitates to form that can cause the columns to clog.
- Improper mixing of lysate and ethanol.
Ensure thorough mixing of the lysate with ethanol to prevent clogging and ensure efficient binding of RNA to the column.
- Presence of impurities in the sample.
Impurities such as cell debris or proteins can cause clogging. Ensure the sample is properly lysed and cleared before loading onto the column.
Degraded RNA may be caused by the following factors:
- RNase contamination.
RNases may be introduced during the use of the kit. Ensure proper procedures are followed when working with RNA. Please refer to “Working with RNA” at the beginning of this user guide.
- Procedure not performed quickly enough.
In order to maintain the integrity of the RNA, it is important that the procedure be performed quickly.
- Improper storage of the purified RNA.
For short term storage RNA samples may be stored at –20°C for a few days. It is recommended that samples be stored at –70°C for longer term storage.
If the RNA does not perform well in downstream applications, it may be due to one or more of the following:
- RNA was not washed three times with the provided Wash Solution A.
Traces of salt from the binding step may remain in the sample if the column is not washed three times with the Wash Solution A. Salt may interfere with downstream applications, and thus must be washed from the column.
- There is ethanol carryover.
Ensure that the dry spin under the Column Wash procedure is performed, in order to remove traces of ethanol prior to elution. Ethanol is known to interfere with many downstream applications.
The contamination with DNA or genomic DNA may be due to the use of large amounts of starting material. To address this issue, it is recommended to perform RNAse-free DNase I digestion as detailed in Appendix A. This step helps ensure the removal of any residual DNA, maintaining the purity of the RNA sample.
Citations
Title | Circulating Micrornas Predict Survival of Patients with Tumors of Glial Origin |
Citation | EbioMedicine 2018. |
Authors | Drusco, A., Fadda, P., Nigita, G., Fassan, M., Bottoni, A., Gardiman, M. P., ... & Casini, B. (2018). |
Title | Integrated microRNA and mRNA network analysis of the human myometrial transcriptome in the transition from quiescence to labor |
Citation | Biology of Reproduction 2018. |
Authors | Ackerman, W. E., Buhimschi, I. A., Brubaker, D., Maxwell, S., Rood, K. M., Chance, M. R., ... & Buhimschi, C. S. (2018) |
Title | Variants of the 5'-terminal region of p53 mRNA influence the ribosomal scanning and translation efficiency |
Citation | Scientific Reports 2018. |
Authors | Zydowicz-Machtel, P., Swiatkowska, A., Popenda, L., Gorska, A., & Ciesiolka, J. (2018) |
Title | PamR, a new MarR-like regulator affecting prophages and metabolic genes expression in Bacillus subtilis |
Citation | Plos One 2017. |
Authors | De San Eustaquio-Campillo, A., Cornilleau, C., Guérin, C., Carballido-López, R., & Chastanet, A. (2017). |
Title | Effect of adenovirus infection on transgene expression under the adenoviral MLP/TPL and the CMVie promoter/enhancer in CHO cells |
Citation | Journal of Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology 2017. |
Authors | El-Mogy, M. A., Abdalla, M. A., Misic, V., & Haj-Ahmad, Y. (2017) |
Title | (Pro)renin receptor (ATP6AP2) depletion arrests As4.1 cells in the G0/G1 phase thereby increasing formation of primary cilia |
Citation | J. Cell. Mol. Med 2017. |
Authors | Wanka, H., Lutze, P., Staar, D., Peters, B., Morch, A., Vogel, L., ... & Peters, J. |
Title | Renal Fibrosis mRNA Classifier: Validation in Experimental Lithium-Induced Interstitial Fibrosis in the Rat Kidney |
Citation | PLoS One 2016. |
Authors | Marti, H. P., Jeffs, A., Scherer, A., Leader, J., Leader, C., Bedford, J., & Walker, R |
Title | 3,4-Dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP) reduces activity of ammonia oxidizers without adverse effects on non-target soil microorganisms and functions |
Citation | Applied Soil Ecology 2016. |
Authors | Kong, X., Duan, Y., Schramm, A., Eriksen, J., & Petersen, S. O. |
Title | The double-domain cytidine deaminase APOBEC3G is a cellular site-specific RNA editing enzyme |
Citation | Nature Scientific Reports 2016. |
Authors | Sharma, S., Patnaik, S. K., Taggart, R. T., & Baysal, B. E |
Title | Expression profiling of selected microRNA signatures in plasma and tissues of Saudi colorectal cancer patients by qPCR |
Citation | Oncology Letters 2016. |
Authors | YAZEED A. AL-SHEIKH1 , HAZEM K. GHNEIM1 , KHALIL I. SOFTA1 , ABDULRAHMAN A. AL-JOBRAN1 , OMAR AL-OBEED2 , MANSOOR A.V. MOHAMED2 , MAHA ABDULLA2 and MOURAD A.M. ABOUL-SOUD |