Plant/Fungi DNA Isolation Kits

Features and Benefits

Rapid and simple procedure
Excellent quality and yield of DNA
Process a broad spectrum of plant species and filamentous fungi
Isolate total DNA including pathogen DNA without phenol
Available in spin column format and 96-well format for high throughput applications

These kits provide a rapid method for the isolation and purification of total DNA from a wide range of plant and fungal species. Total DNA, including genomic DNA, mitochondrial DNA and chloroplast DNA can be purified from fresh or frozen plant tissues, plant cells or fungi samples using this kit. Purified DNA samples can be used for the detection of viral pathogens, as viral DNA is isolated with the plant/fungi DNA. The purified DNA is of the highest integrity, and can be used in a number of downstream applications including PCR, qPCR, SNP, Southern blotting and sequencing.

Plant/Fungi DNA Isolation Kit (Spin Column)

Complete 10 purifications in 45 minutes. This kit offers a maximum loading volume of 650 μL per column, and a maximum binding capacity of 50 μg per column.

Plant/Fungi DNA Isolation 96-Well Kit (High Throughput)

For high throughput applications. Purification with the 96-well plates can be integrated with a robotic automation system. Complete 96 purifications in 50 minutes. This kit offers a maximum loading volume of 500 μL per well, and a maximum binding capacity of 50 μg per well.

Plant/Fungi DNA Isolation Kit (Magnetic Bead System)

The DNA is bound to the surface of the magnetic beads under optimized buffer conditions and released using a low salt buffer system. The Plant DNA Isolation Kit (Magnetic Bead System) can be easily adapted to automated magnetic bead separation instruments and work stations.

Plant/Fungi DNA Isolation 96-Well Kit (High Throughput Magnetic Bead System)

For high throughput applications. Purification with the 96-well plates can be integrated with a robotic automation system.

Details

Supporting Data

Figure 1. Isolate DNA from a Wide Range of Plants. DNA was isolated from 50 mg samples of tobacco leaves (Lanes 1 and 2), tomato leaves (lanes 3 and 4), peach leaves (Lanes 5 and 6) and grape leaves (lanes 7 and 8) using Norgene’s Plant/Fungi DNA Isolation Kit, and 5 µL aliquots of the 100 µL elutions were run on a 1x TAE 1% agarose gel. As it can be seen, high quality DNA was isolated in all cases. The M lanes contain Norgen’s HighRanger 1Kb DNA Ladder.

Figure 2. Purified DNA can be Amplified in a Real-time PCR Reaction (SYBR Green). DNA was isolated from 50 mg samples of plum and tobacco frozen leaves using Norgen’s Plant/Fungi DNA isolation Kit, and 2 µL of the eluted DNA was used in a real-time PCR reaction (total reaction volume 20 µL) with 18sr DNA primers (95°C for 3 minutes and 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 seconds and 60°C for 30 seconds). The real-time PCR was successful in amplifying both the plum and tobacco DNA, indicating that the DNA is of a high quality and can be used in sensitive downstream applications.

Figure 3. Resolution of DNA isolated from four different plant species. DNA was isolated from four different plant species using Norgen’s Plant DNA Isolation Kit (Magnetic Bead System) and Norgen's Plant/Fungi DNA Isolation Kit (column format, Cat. 26200). For evaluation, 10 µL from 75 µL of elution were run on 1X TAE 1.2% agarose gel. Excellent DNA integrity and yield were observed from the Plant DNA Isolation Kit (Magnetic Bead System) (Lanes 1 to 3), indicating the robust performance comparable to the column based method (Red C). Marker = Norgen’s HighRanger DNA Ladder./p>

Figure 4. High DNA Quality. DNA was isolated from a number of plant species using Norgen's Plant DNA Isolation Kit (Magnetic Bead System) and Norgen's Plant/Fungi DNA Isolation Kit (column format, Cat. 26200). The purified DNA was then compared for DNA quality (A260/280). All DNA elutions isolated using Norgen’s Plant DNA Isolation Kit (Magnetic Bead System) showed an excellent comparable DNA quality to Norgen’s Plant/Fungi DNA Isolation Kit (column based, Cat. 26200), indicating the consistent and robust performance of the Plant DNA Isolation Kit (Magnetic Bead System).

Figure 5. High DNA quality was confirmed by Real-time PCR. DNA was isolated from six different plant species using Norgen's Plan DNA Isolation Kit (Magnetic Bead System) and Norgen's Plant/Fungi DNA Isolation Kit (column format, Cat. 26200). To assess the quality of the purified DNA, 8 µL of the elution (total PCR reaction volume was 20 µL) was used in a real-time PCR reaction. As it can be seen, 18s rDNA amplification was successful in all cases without PCR inhibition, indicating the excellent quality of DNA purified using Norgen’s Plant DNA Isolation Kit (Magnetic Bead System).

Figure 6. DNA was Isolated From Plant Tissue Using Norgen’s Plant DNA Isolation 96-Well Kit (Magnetic Bead System). For evaluation, 10 µL from 75 µL of elution were run on 1X TAE 1.2% agarose gel. Excellent DNA integrity, consistency, and yield were observed from the Plant DNA Isolation 96-Well Kit (Magnetic Bead System). Marker = Norgen’s HighRanger DNA Ladder (Cat. 11900).

Figure 7. High DNA Quality Confirmed By Real-time PCR. DNA was isolated from plant tissue species using Norgen's Plant DNA Isolation 96-Well Kit (Magnetic Bead System). To assess the quality of the purified DNA, 2 µL of the elution (total PCR reaction volume was 20 µL) was used in a real-time PCR reaction. As it can be seen, 18s rDNA amplification was successful in all cases without PCR inhibition, indicating the excellent quality of DNA purified using Norgen’s Plant DNA Isolation 96-Well Kit (Magnetic Bead System).

Kit Specifications - Spin Column
Column Binding Capacity	50 μg
Maximum Column Loading Volume	650 μL
Maximum Amount of Starting Material: Plant Tissues Fungi (wet weight)	100 mg 100 mg
Average Yields* 50 mg Tomato Leaves 50 mg Grape Leaves 50 mg Peach Leaves 50 mg Plum Leaves 50 mg Pine Needles Botrytis cinerea (50 mg wet weight) Fusarium sp. (50 mg wet weight) Aspergillus niger (50 mg wet weight)	18 µg 10 µg 10 µg 10 µg 5 µg 1.5 µg 2 µg 4 µg
Time to Complete 10 Purifications	45 minutes

* Average yields will vary depending upon a number of factors including species, growth conditions used and developmental stage.

* Average yields will vary depending upon a number of factors including species, growth conditions used and developmental stage.

Storage Conditions and Product Stability
All solutions should be kept tightly sealed and stored at room temperature, except for the RNAse which should be stored at -20°C. This kit is stable for 1 year after the date of shipment.

Select Plants and Fungi that can be used with the Plant/Fungi DNA Purification Kits

Plants	Plants (Cont'd)	Fungi
Tomato	Turnip	Aspergillus niger
Grape	Chinese Cabbage	Mucor racemosus
Peach	Radish	Cladosporium cladosporioides
Plum	Komatsuna	Fusarium oxysporum
Pine Needles	Apricot	Penicillium sp.
Raspberry	Sweet Potato	Botrytis cinerea (Botryotinia fuckeliana)
Strawberry	Hydrangea	Pichia sp.
Legumes	Fig	Rhizopus oryzae
Prosopis cineraria (Ghaf)	Turf	Alternaria tenuissima
Sorghum grass	Cherry	Fusarium sp.
Tobacco	Saintpaulia
Arabidopsis	Lotus
Lichen	Carrot
Corn seed	Hansen
Sunflower seed	Pistachio
Olive seed
Soybean seed

Component	Cat. 26200 (50 preps)	Cat. 26250 (250 preps)	Cat. 26900 (192 preps)	Cat. 58200 (50 preps)	Cat. 62400 (192 preps)
Lysis Buffer L	30 mL	1 x 30 mL 2 x 60 mL	2 x 60 mL	60 mL	2 x 60 mL
Binding Buffer I	7 mL	1 x 7 mL 1 x 25 mL	25 mL	7 mL	25 mL
Solution WN	18 mL	1 x 18 mL 1 x 55 mL	55 mL	18 mL	55 mL
Wash Solution A	38 mL	2 x 38 mL	2 x 38 mL	-	-
Elution Buffer B	15 mL	30 mL	30 mL	8 mL	30 mL
RNAse A	1 vial (80 μL)	5 vials (5 x 80 μL)	1 vial	1 vial	1 vial
Magnetic Bead Suspension	-	-	-	4 x 1.1 mL	2 x 8.5 mL
Filter Columns	50	250	-	-	-
Spin Columns	50	250	-	-	-
Collection Tubes	100	500	-	-	-
96-Well Plate	-	-	2	-	2
96-Well Collection Plate	-	-	2	-	-
Adhesive Tape	-	-	4	-	2
Elution Tubes (1.7 mL)	50	250	-	50	-
96-Well Elution Plate	-	-	2	-	2
Product Insert	1	1	1	1	1

Documentation

FAQs

Spin Column, High Throughput, Magnetic Bead System, High Throughput Magnetic Bead System

Why do I have poor DNA recovery?

Poor DNA recovery could be due to one or more of the following:

Columns/wells have become clogged (Spin column or 96-well plate format).
Do not exceed the recommended amounts of starting materials. The amount of starting material may need to be decreased if the column shows clogging below the recommended levels. See also “Clogged Column” below.
An alternative elution buffer was used.
It is recommended that the Elution Buffer B supplied with this kit be used for maximum DNA recovery.
Ethanol was not added to the lysate.
Ensure that the indicated amount of ethanol (70% or 96-100% as mentioned in the protocol) is added to the lysate before binding to the columns/wells or introduction of magnetic bead suspension.
Ethanol was not added to the Wash Solution.
Ensure the indicated 96-100% ethanol amount is added to the supplied Solution WN and Wash Solution A prior to use.
This kit has 2 columns (clear - filter columns; grey - most likely silica).
Please make sure the columns were not interchanged. If that happens, then all DNA would be lost in the first step.

I noticed that the columns/wells are clogged. What causes this?

Column clogging may be due to one or more of the following reasons:

Maximum amount of tissue exceeds kit specifications.
The optimal input of plant tissue or fungi (wet weight) for each kit has been described under Kit specifications and also in the product insert.
Too much cell debris in the lysate supernatant.
The lysate should be centrifuged at 20,000 x g (~14,000 RPM) for 5 minutes and the clean supernatant should be used to proceed.
Centrifuge temperature is too low.
Ensure that the centrifuge remains at room temperature throughout the procedure. Temperatures below 20°C may cause precipitates to form that can cause the columns to clog.

Why is the purified DNA not performing well in downstream applications?

If the DNA does not perform well in downstream applications, it may be due to one or more of the following:

PCR reaction conditions need to be optimized.
Take steps to optimize the PCR conditions being used, including varying the amount of DNA template, changing the source of Taq polymerase, looking into the primer design, and adjusting the annealing condition.
Binding Buffer I was not added to the lysate.
Ensure that the Binding Buffer I is added to the lysate and that it is incubated on ice for 5 minutes prior to spinning down the lysate.
DNA was not washed as directed in the kit manual.
Traces of salt from the binding step may remain in the sample if the column is not washed as directed in the kit manual. Salt may interfere with downstream applications, and thus must be washed from the column/wells/beads.
Ethanol carryover.
Ensure that the drying step is performed after the wash steps in order to remove traces of ethanol prior to elution. Ethanol is known to interfere with many downstream applications.

How to ensure that eluted DNA is not contaminated with RNA?

RNA can get co-eluted with DNA. Carry out a digestion with RNase A on the elution if the RNA present will interfere with downstream applications. Refer to manufacturer’s instructions regarding amount of enzyme to use, optimal incubation time and temperature.

Can the DNA from this ki be used for Long-read-sequencing?

Yes, the DNA from this kit is good for long-read-sequencing.

Can this kit be used for isolating DNA from samples preserved in silica gel?

Yes, it is possible to isolate DNA from bone tissue using this kit after decalcification of the tissue. Please feel free to contact our Tech support team at support@norgenbiotek.com for help with decalcification protocol.

Citations

Title	Antagonistic activity and molecular characterization of biological control agent Trichoderma harzianum from Saudi Arabia
Citation	Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control 2020.
Authors	Mazrou, Y. S. A., Makhlouf, A. H., Elseehy, M. M., Awad, M. F., & Hassan, M. M. (2020)

Title	Somatic embryogenesis is an effective strategy for dissecting chimerism phenomena in Vitis vinifera cv Nebbiolo
Citation	Plant cell reports 2020.
Authors	Gambino, G., Moine, A., Boccacci, P., Perrone, I., & Pagliarani, C. (2020)

Title	Comparative molecular genetic diversity between Trichoderma spp. from Egypt and Saudi Arabia
Citation	Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control 2020.
Authors	Mazrou, Y. S. A., Baazeem, A., Makhlouf, A. H., Sabry, A., Ismail, M., & Hassan, M. M. (2020)

Title	Genetic Resources of Olea europaea L. in the Garda Trentino Olive Groves Revealed by Ancient Trees Genotyping and Parentage Analysis of Drupe Embryos
Citation	Genes 2020.
Authors	Moreno-Sanz, P., Lombardo, L., Lorenzi, S., Michelotti, F., & Grando, M. S. (2020)

Title	Detection of Powdery Mildew Growth in Hazelnut Plant Using PCR.
Citation	Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology 2020.
Authors	Baykal, U. (2020).

Title	Association of genetic and climatic variability in giant sequoia, Sequoiadendron giganteum , reveals signatures of local adaptation along moisture-related gradients.
Citation	Ecology and Evolution 2020.
Authors	DeSilva, R., & Dodd, R. S. (2020).

Title	First characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome of fungal plant-pathogen Monilinia laxa which represents the mobile intron rich structure
Citation	Scientific Reports 2020.
Authors	Yildiz, G., & Ozkilinc, H. (2020)

Title	Antimicrobial activity of endophytic fungi isolated from the mangrove plant Sonneratia apetala (Buch.-Ham) from the Sundarbans mangrove forest
Citation	Advances in Traditional Medicine 2020.
Authors	Nurunnabi, T. R., Sabrin, F., Sharif, D. I., Nahar, L., Sohrab, Md. H., Sarker, S. D., Rahman, S. M. M., & Billah, Md. M. (2020)

Title	Refining the Genomic Region Containing a Major Locus Controlling Fruit Maturity in Peach
Citation	Scientific Reports 2019.
Authors	Elsadr, H., Sherif, S., Banks, T., Somers, D., & Jayasankar, S.

Title	Cadmium Toxicity in Wheat: Impacts on Element Contents, Antioxidant Enzyme Activities, Oxidative Stress, and Genotoxicity
Citation	Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology 2019.
Authors	Çatav, S. S., Genç, T. O., Oktay, M. K., & Küçükakyüz, K. (2019)